[PD] signal math explanation

[i go bananas]

this whole thread is about a typo?

i have never seen

[sig~]
|\
[+~]
|\
[+~]



but have often seen

[sig~]
|\
[*~]
|\
[+~]






On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:

> Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the
> help file updates J!)
>
> On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request at iem.at wrote:
>
> *From: *Pall Thayer <pallthay at gmail.com>
> *Subject: **Re: [PD] signal math explanation*
> *Date: *January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST
> *To: *Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> *Cc: *pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
>
>
> I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pall,
>>      Which help patches?  I haven't seen a single help patch that
>> substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple
>> multiplication would do.
>>
>> I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the
>> same.
>>
>
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140120/d55b4f8b/attachment.htm>