[PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2014-03-09 14:15, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> k ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't
>> investigate why but
>>> just used [udpsend] instead.
> [netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it
> sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two
> expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255).
> [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and
> thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend],
> but not [netsend].

well, starting with Pd-0.45 [netsend] has support for binary data,
which makes it compatible with [udpsend].
you have to pass it the "-b" switch though, so
 [udpsend] == [netsend -u -b]
 [tcpsend] == [netsend -b]

gfmdasr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=eYgf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----