[PD] Peak Level detect in Vanilla

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Tue Mar 11 01:31:17 CET 2014


> What is the difference between using
> an abstraction or a compiled class?

well, I assume they can be more efficient, but my only point here is what I
said already and that you agree with - peak level should be available,
seems like lots of trouble to need to make an abstraction for it. I know
there's an external around, but I mean it deserves to be in vanilla.

cheers


2014-03-10 4:32 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>:

> On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 22:32 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
>
> > Why not an abstraction in my point of view? Well, looks kinda
> > cumbersome for that particular goal.
>
> I am with you in that I think it makes sense to extend [env~]. Regarding
> abstractions, I don't see what is cumbersome. What is the difference
> between using an abstraction or a compiled class?
>
> Roman
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140310/d16da9c8/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list