[PD] Alternatives to arraycopy

[Jonathan Wilkes]

I used some simple data mining techniques to infer the following: you didn't actually test those objects in a patch before writing your response.

[ads based on this inference go here]

-Jonathan

On Monday, March 31, 2014 9:05 AM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
 
Just play it (tabplay~) into the other one (tabrecord~).  You can do this
at many times 'normal' speed if you want by putting it in a subpatch
with a high sample rate.

cheers
Miller

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:58:22AM -0400, Johann Diedrick wrote:
> Hi Pd list-
> 
> I have a question about the object arraycopy. It works great, but I'm
> copying an array with 13230000 points (5 minutes of audio at 44,100 hz) and
> it seems very slow. In particular, my patch seems to "lock" up for about
> 2-3 seconds when making the copy. The audio stops for those 2 seconds, and
> the UI seems to lock up. While this isn't a huge game changer for my
> purposes, I wish there was an alternative for this. Is there a better
> solution for making a copy on the fly for an array this big that is faster,
> doesn't lock up the patch or kill the audio for that time period? Maybe
> there is a threaded solution?
> 
> I'd love to hear any thoughts on this!
> 
> Thanks so much,
> 
> -Johann

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140331/5a37b229/attachment.htm>