[PD] can [bp~] be obtained with biquad coefficients?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

now trying to make [vcf~], that looks like a toughy... :P


2014-04-12 17:07 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>:

> On Sam, 2014-04-12 at 03:45 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > > change the [fexpr~] to something like
> > > [fexpr~ $x[0] + ($f2 * $y[-1]) + ($f3 * $y[-2])]
> >
> >
> > f*ck, I'll be damned, now my patch that implements [bp~] with [fexpr~]
> > seems to work, it's attached. Thanks!
>
> That is great! I never really dug into that topic, but having it as a
> patch makes it more accessible I think, at least for me.
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140413/adc64d7a/attachment.htm>