[PD] WG: Inverse bandpass filter

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 00:51:42 CEST 2014

can;t remember where I saw about this, but check this link


see the quote "An easy and practical way to remove the zero-frequency
component from an audio signal is to use a one-pole low-pass filter to
extract it, and then subtract the result from the signal. The resulting
transfer function is one minus the transfer function of the low-pass

doesn't it agree with what I said?


2014-04-22 14:37 GMT-03:00 Robert Esler <robert at urbanstew.org>:

> I could be wrong, but I don't think it's quite the same thing.  I believe
> the signal would be out of phase negating many of the effects of the
> filter.  I would recommend using [biquad~] and in pd-extended there is a
> [notch] object which takes care of the coefficients.  This sounds much
> cleaner and more notch-like to my ear than subtracting the filtered output.
>  There is an explanation in Miller's book if you like unit circle math:
> http://msp.ucsd.edu/techniques/latest/book-html/node144.html
> -----------
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:59:07 -0300
> From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] WG: Inverse bandpass filter
> To: Ingo <ingo at miamiwave.com>
> Cc: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>
> Message-ID:
> <CAEAsFmhD0HanLmv9vutcSQZjkZY69i7wMeBqQ+20S2riWYaakw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> isn't it just subtract the audio from the filtered output?
> I guess you can get inverse freq response just by that
> cheers
> 2014-04-18 17:21 GMT-03:00 Ingo <ingo at miamiwave.com>:
> You could send the original signal in parallel and invert the phase by
> multiplying with -1. You might have to delay the original signal in case
> that the processed signal gets also delayed by one or more blocks.
> Ingo
> _______________________________________
> > Von: pd-list-bounces at iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces at iem.at<pd-list-bounces at iem.at>]
> Im Auftrag
> von
> > AP Vague
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. April 2014 18:49
> > An: pd-list at iem.at
> > Betreff: [PD] Inverse bandpass filter
> >
> > Is there a simple way to make [bp~] or [vcf~] have an inverse function?
> To
> > filter out, rather than pass a changing frequency value. Is the easiest
> > way to do this with a combination of [lop~] and [hip~]?
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140422/186063a9/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list