[PD] convolution using pd-vanilla

[david medine]

For the FFT based convolution, you could easily modify the example patch 
I06.timbre.stamp.pd to do straight up convolution in the frequency 
domain. I wouldn't know how to do it in the time domain without an 
extern or a lot of painstaking work. It might be a nice thing to have, 
though.

I can tell you, though, that the frequency domain method will out 
perform the time domain in terms of CPU usage. But, since you are 
windowing there will be a latency. Apart from that, the output is 
identical by both methods.

y(n) = x(n) * g(n)
Y(k) = X(k)G(k), y(n) = IDFT(Y(k))

where g(n) is the impulse response, X(k) is the discrete Fourier 
transform of x(n) and * is the convolution operation.

On 05/05/2014 09:33 AM, Oli Larkin wrote:
> hi,
>
> is anyone aware of an example of both a brute force time domain (e.g. buffir~ in Max) and an FFT-based fast convolution patch in pd-vanilla? I would like to do a comparison of the two. Can be using a small IR, just for demo purposes.
>
> cheers,
>
> Oli
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list