[PD] bp coefficient calculation test

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 04:47:54 CEST 2014


btw, here's my lop test that works perfectly; cheers


2014-07-21 23:24 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:

> Hi there, as I've been saying here, I've been studying about filters and
> trying to emulate some of the filters as raw filters, or in biquad
> coefficients.
>
> I thought I had nailed [bp~], but now it seems there's some minor
> discrepancy between the original object and my patch implementation. Check
> the test patch I made:
>
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3AoiT0xk8fnWmhuYWtPdk9UYUU/edit
>
> I'm analysing a  filtered noise with [env~] and the resulting numbers
> should match exactly in order to prove I've done it right, but a small
> difference in value insists on showing up.
>
> Would any of you be interested in checking it up? Maybe you can find some
> mistake that could be corrected and then match the numbers perfectly, or
> maybe you could tell me why there's such a small difference and it'll
> always be there... I don't know. I have the full code in the patch for you
> to check it out.
>
> All I know is that I've done the same thing with lop~ and numbers match
> beautifully
>
> By the way, [vcf~] is next on my list
>
> Thanks!
> cheers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140721/1a397cc9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lop-test.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4802 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140721/1a397cc9/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list