[PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Jul 25 13:18:18 CEST 2014


On 07/24/2014 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>> vcf~ isn't a 2-pole real filter but a 1-pole complex one
> 
> kinda relative to this, since biquad~ can be emulated with 2 complex poles
> + 2 complex zeros

it can not only be emulated, it can be implemented with a complex
2-pole/2-zero filter.

> , is it more accurate to say biquad is a
> 2-complex_pole-2-complex_zero-filter???
> 

no.
it's accurate to say that [biquad~] is a real-valued 2-pole/2-zero filter.

real values are a subset of complex values (with the imaginary part set
to 0).

> In its description it says it is a 2-pole-2-zero-filter...

which is true.

gfmasdr
IOhannes


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140725/7d96ecc2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list