[PD] comments with trailing | ?

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 05:26:22 CEST 2014


I too also wonder why people have problems with the configure script. It works great and allows you to install pd on Linux easily.

On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:19 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:

> From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] comments with trailing | ?
> Date: August 6, 2014 at 11:08:21 AM CDT
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> 
> 
> On 01/31/2014 09:47 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> 
>> Btw-- I haven't tested this.  I'd be a lot more likely to try out code
>> on Pd Vanilla 0.45 if someone could explain to me how to do incremental
>> builds.  If I change a single line in g_text.c in 0.43 it only requires
>> a single "make" that takes about 3 seconds.  Doing the same in 0.45
>> requires "make clean && make", unnecessarily rebuilding all of Pd. 
> 
> why?
> 
>> Doing "make" in the src directory of 0.45 only rebuilds the things that
>> need to recompile, but it doesn't update the binary, which makes it
>> useless.
> 
> how come?
> 
> it works fine here, and the binary is updated immediately.
> 
> but, then i don't know which "binary" you are talking about.
> the actual "pd" binary produced by the autotools, will live in
> ".../src/pd" (as opposed to .../bin/pd produced by the "traditional"
> makefile), maybe you just checked the wrong one?
> 
> i'm very much in favour of the autotools, as they make the build-system
> standards conformant. e.g. it's simple to inject *additional* FLAGS
> (e.g. for security builds). that's whey it is used for the Debian packages.
> 
> 
> gfmdsar
> IOhannes

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140806/024b75e9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list