[PD] Updated pd-extended
jancsika at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 24 07:35:59 CEST 2014
On 09/23/2014 09:19 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> I disagree. Your example lists what? 2 more developers? I'm talking
> about "developers" as in people working the C code, build scripts,
> tcl/tk etc aka people who could, theoretically, help push out a new
> Pd-extended release. True, we have plenty of people working on
> externals, but this is a problem for someone who can go deeper.
> I still maintain that the number of low level developers to overall
> users (non-developers) is relatively low.
That's true in nearly any piece of user-facing software. But compared
to other user-facing software, Pd seems to have a fairly large number of
users with a working knowledge of C, building/compiling, etc. Enough
that I can think of at least 13 for whom there is proof just by what
I've read from them on the user list. But there are probably many more
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at
> <mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>> However, your description of the user/developer ratio doesn't ring
>> true to me. There's actually a surplus of developers and development
>> energy-- I count two implementations of presets in the last year or
>> two (in Pd-l2ork and the Chocolate et Coffee lib) which are in
>> addition to however many already exist on svn and the Pd forum.
> Dan Wilcox
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com>
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list