[PD] Updated pd-extended

[Jonathan Wilkes]

On 09/23/2014 09:19 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> I disagree. Your example lists what? 2 more developers? I'm talking 
> about "developers" as in people working the C code, build scripts, 
> tcl/tk etc aka people who could, theoretically, help push out a new 
> Pd-extended release. True, we have plenty of people working on 
> externals, but this is a problem for someone who can go deeper.
>
> I still maintain that the number of low level developers to overall 
> users (non-developers) is relatively low.

That's true in nearly any piece of user-facing software.  But compared 
to other user-facing software, Pd seems to have a fairly large number of 
users with a working knowledge of C, building/compiling, etc.  Enough 
that I can think of at least 13 for whom there is proof just by what 
I've read from them on the user list.  But there are probably many more 
than that.

-Jonathan

>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at 
> <mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>
>> However, your description of the user/developer ratio doesn't ring 
>> true to me.  There's actually a surplus of developers and development 
>> energy-- I count two implementations of presets in the last year or 
>> two (in Pd-l2ork and the Chocolate et Coffee lib) which are in 
>> addition to however many already exist on svn and the Pd forum.
>
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140924/fecefc18/attachment-0001.html>