[PD] PDCon (was Updated pd-extended)
megrimm at gmail.com
Fri Sep 26 03:40:47 CEST 2014
>> I was waiting for the american PdCon and it never happened
hans and dan had talked about this. maybe it could still happen? ed had
talked about london once i remember in '09?
>> guess I'll have to make another south american one
brazil? or somewhere else in s. america? do it! your a great organizer....
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> love those two ideas
> I could also add the idea of having some research group working on it. At
> least here in Brazil I know a couple of people who'd like to back it up.
> so yeah, I was waiting for the american PdCon and it never happened :(
> guess I'll have to make another south american one
> 2014-09-21 18:19 GMT-03:00 me.grimm <megrimm at gmail.com>:
> >> it involves time
>> ... or money.
>> maybe we revisit the kickstarter (or something else) idea brought forth
>> by jonathon a few years ago and just pay someone to do it. to me it seems
>> like 1) none of us really have any money (im just assuming here we are all
>> poor artists) and more importantly 2) none of us really have any time and
>> those that do might not have the skills.
>> OR maybe we have another PDCon (remember that?) to get amped up and pump
>> something out....
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I talked to Hans about this a bit. In essence, it involves bringing in
>>> the new pd vanilla source and making sure the Pd-extended
>>> additions/modifications aren't lost. With the updates/cleanups to the
>>> tcl/tk sources a few years ago (great work Hans et al!), it should be alot
>>> easier than the previous extended releases. But still, *easy* or not, it
>>> involves time.
>>> On Sep 21, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>>> *From: *Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
>>> *Subject: **Re: [PD] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Updated pd-extended*
>>> *Date: *September 20, 2014 at 5:02:59 PM EDT
>>> *To: *Billy Stiltner <billy.stiltner at gmail.com>
>>> *Cc: *"pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
>>> I wish I knew something about coding to help out with its development :P
>>> I do care a lot about it though and wish I could help in some other way.
>>> I do see a few problems with extended, but they're basically related to
>>> some of the externals and libraries that sometimes do not work as they
>>> should, have bad and messy help files and are sometimes redundanct. If
>>> welcome, I could help sharing my thoughts and two cents about that, but I
>>> realize those are not actual bug fixes regarding the code, so it's not a
>>> priority on its to do list and issues for being updated to another release.
>>> Anyway, while were at it, what kind of work exactly do you mean someone
>>> would have to do? I suppose there is a great list of bug fixes just to keep
>>> it basically what it is. Given the context, I'm not assuming any big to do
>>> list for some new features agenda. But besidesthe bug fixes, how hard is it
>>> for someone to just update to the latest vanilla core?
>>> Well, since Pd is an open source project that relies on community
>>> effort, and this is the list of its main developers and users, I guess this
>>> is the place to talk about a collaboration and see if we can get Pd-extended's
>>> to continue.
>>> I'd to help in any way I can.
>>> Dan Wilcox
>>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m.
>> megrimm at gmail.com
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m.
megrimm at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list