[PD] Why do i get glitches at 70% cpu load?

Ivica Bukvic ico at vt.edu
Sun Oct 5 03:19:21 CEST 2014


FWIW IIRC you should be able to compile freeverb with appropriate
optimization flag where denormals should not affect it.
On Oct 4, 2014 6:46 PM, "James Dunn" <james at 4thharmonic.com> wrote:

> Are you using [freeverb~]?
>
> This can cause excessive CPU usage due to denormals. Try putting the
> [freeverb~] object in a subpatch and [switch~] off audio processing for
> that subpatch or add a small amount of [noise~] to the input.
>
> Quoth Ronni Montoya, on 04/10/2014 21:34:
>
>> Hi, i have a very big patch that is producing glitches at 70% cpu load.
>> Is this normal behaivor?   With my old computer i only used to get
>> glitches when i go over 100 % cpu load .....any idea why its producing
>> 70% cpus load?
>> The patch has a lot subpatches and a lot of big tables with data (like
>> 100 tables)  ... is this a bad practice in pd?   having a lot of
>> subpatches, gui elements  and tables can affect the sound?
>> Do you think that it would be better if i put all in just one patch (
>> withouth too much subpatches?), and delete gui elements ? maybe are
>> the tables?
>> What do you recommend me?
>>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> R.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>> listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20141004/b3def75e/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list