[PD] strange bug [f], Pd 0.45.5
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Oct 8 00:17:30 CEST 2014
On 10/07/2014 08:51 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
> I attached the patch.
thanks.
for the future, it would be welcome if you only attached the pd-patch.
the png does not add any additional information, might not show the
actual problem and is (in the specific case) about 80 times bigger than
the pd-patch.
> I understand what is the problem, but I don't have
> the real solution for this. I want to know how to prevent this situation.
>
my ascii-art patch should have given you the clue:
>>>
>>>
>>> |
>>> | +------+
>>> [f] |
>>> | |
>>> [+ 1] |
>>> | |
>>> [% 6] |
>>> | |
>>> [t f f] |
>>> | +--+
>>> |
>>>
#0 use trigger whenever you want to connect a single outlet to multiple
inlets (this is general advice, and is not related to your *current*
problem)
#1 keep the [% 6] in the loop. it will make sure that the number that is
incremented will never get into the problematic range (even if you force
it to a too-high value (e.g. by sending a large number directly into the
counter) it will bring the values down to an operable range and thus
"magically" fix the problem in the next iteration.
gfmasdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20141008/a50d948b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list