[PD] strange bug [f], Pd 0.45.5

Jonghyun Kim agitato816 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 07:26:49 CEST 2014


Thanks for the advice and your time, IOhannes.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:17 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> On 10/07/2014 08:51 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
> > I attached the patch.
>
> thanks.
> for the future, it would be welcome if you only attached the pd-patch.
> the png does not add any additional information, might not show the
> actual problem and is (in the specific case) about 80 times bigger than
> the pd-patch.
>
>
> > I understand what is the problem, but I don't have
> > the real solution for this. I want to know how to prevent this situation.
> >
>
> my ascii-art patch should have given you the clue:
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         |
> >>>         | +------+
> >>>         [f]      |
> >>>         |        |
> >>>         [+ 1]    |
> >>>         |        |
> >>>         [% 6]    |
> >>>         |        |
> >>>         [t f f]  |
> >>>         |     +--+
> >>>         |
> >>>
>
> #0 use trigger whenever you want to connect a single outlet to multiple
> inlets (this is general advice, and is not related to your *current*
> problem)
>
> #1 keep the [% 6] in the loop. it will make sure that the number that is
> incremented will never get into the problematic range (even if you force
> it to a too-high value (e.g. by sending a large number directly into the
> counter) it will bring the values down to an operable range and thus
> "magically" fix the problem in the next iteration.
>
>
> gfmasdr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20141008/78e2f90a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list