[PD] Named arguments for abstractions
Roman Haefeli
reduzent at gmail.com
Fri Oct 24 10:51:01 CEST 2014
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 11:28 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a design pattern for passing named arguments ("bar=true foo=12")
> into an abstraction.
Cool idea! Although Jonathan has point in stating the comma-separated
syntax may be more Pd-ish, I still very much like the look of your
proposed syntax. I'm probably gonna use it for some of my stuff (once I
manage to decide to leave compatibility with 0.43 behind).
Thanks for sharing.
Roman
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list