[PD] bug in pd-osc package in Ubuntu utopic
antoine.villeret at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 13:21:27 CET 2014
yep, but unfortunately this is not the only one
I found another bug in [packOSC], see [sf#1167]
[sf#1167] : https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/bugs/1167/
do it yourself
2014-11-07 9:48 GMT+01:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 17:53 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 11/06/2014 11:21 AM, Antoine Villeret wrote:
>> > 2014-11-06 10:26 GMT+01:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
>> > here is a minimal patch that remonstrate the issue
>> > [print bug] prints the right float to console
>> > but the number box doesn't understand it...
>> > this is of course with pd-osc-1.0-2 from wheezy
>> > current SVN revision works well
>> ah i see and can reproduce the problem (my last email used the wrong
>> version of [routeOSC], so forget that).
>> afair, [routeOSC] used to only be able to route a *single* element from
>> the OSC-address. so [routeOSC /a/b] was an illegal string.
>> at least that was my understanding (as it didn't work).
>> i checked the actual output of the buggy example, and it really sends a
>> message with an empty selector ("") followed by the number you were
>> so putting an [unpack s f] after the [routeOSC] will give the number on
>> the second outlet.
>> of course this is really a bug.
>> it's a bummer that Debian/jessie was frozen yesterday, which means that
>> a minor bug like this won't get fixed for jessie :-(
> That is really unlucky. Thanks for reporting this, Antoine. I was
> surprised to read about that bug, since I've been working a lot with OSC
> classes and never triggered it. I've used [routeOSC] in so many ways,
> but obviously not this :-/
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list