[PD] Conflict between radcrusher/bitcrusher and writesf~
chris at mccormick.cx
Thu Nov 20 04:24:49 CET 2014
On 20/11/14 04:31, Ronni Montoya wrote:
> Any idea why is this? how can i solve this problem?
My guess is something to do with changing blocksize using block~. Would
help if you posted the abstractions.
You can accomplish both bitcrushing and downsampling without affecting
the actual blocksize Pd is running at by using samphold~ and wrap~.
More information about the Pd-list