[PD] future PD-extended development

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Dec 23 19:29:26 CET 2014

On 12/23/2014 03:27 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> what’s important is to break out the external development from the SVN into smaller, more maintainable repos

i have to admit i totally fail to see, why having all the source code in
a single SVN-root makes things more or less complicated.
unlike git, SVN allows you to easily check out a sub-directory and work
as if it as a "smaller, more maintainable repo".

things would be different if *the* pd-repo were in git (but it currently
is not).
while i personally prefer git over SVN, i think it should be upstream's
decision which VCS (if any) they want to use.

i think that any packaging/distribution solution that depends on a
certain repository format and/or layout, is inherently broken.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20141223/f1e9fdfc/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list