[PD] knowing if there's anything connected to an [inlet~] in a subpatch or abstraction

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 18:26:15 CET 2015


I thought about it, but the the problem is that I'd like the signal to
update the incoming value even if it is 0...

so it doesn't quite make it.

thanks


2015-02-24 14:20 GMT-03:00 Joe White <white.joe4 at gmail.com>:

> Hey Alexandre,
>
> Does this do want you want? Toggles between a signal input converted to
> control rate and a default value (if the signal is 0)
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> On 24 February 2015 at 17:08, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> hi, trying to make an abstraction here that loads a number argument into
>> an audio signal chain, but I'd like to update the argument to whatever is
>> coming from an [inlet~], but then I'd like to load back the argument
>> whenever there is no signal connected to this inlet.
>>
>> The only way to do this is if I know wether there was something connected
>> to this inlet or not, and I believe that's impossible in a
>> subpatch/abstraction, right?
>>
>> So, the only way out would be compiling a new object, huh?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Follow me on Twitter @diplojocus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150224/c5220975/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list