[PD] maximum "control rate" in Pd

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 18:06:43 CET 2015


> There's an attempt to explain all this in chapter 3 of Technique

awesome, I'm on it ;)

2015-03-12 13:13 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>:

> There's an attempt to explain all this in chapter 3 of Techniques..
>
> http://msp.ucsd.edu/techniques.htm
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:04:17PM +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <
> porres at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > ok, so the metro at 1ms is because I'm using extended.
> > >
> > > as for the minimum time pd can process and send data, what's the final
> > > word on it?
> > >
> > > something like 1.4013e-45 ms?
> > >
> > > cause that's a lot more than an audio rate at 44.1khz :)
> > >
> > 1.4013e-45 is smaller than 0.0226757....
> >
> > >
> > > I thought there was a limit control rate that was below the audio rate,
> > > but curiously it can go over.
> > >
> > > 1 sample at 44.1khz gives us 0.0226757 ms, and I was able to send bangs
> > > at 1e-06 ms, according to [timer]
> > >
> > > check my patch attached, based on the one that was sent here on the
> thread.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150312/b0e745ad/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list