[PD] So [bang~] can't "bang" in less than 64 blocksize, huh?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

It seems there are other objects that somehow restrict themselves to a 64
size block minimum.

print~ will always start printing from the beginning of a 64 block period

snapshot~ will always output the last sample from an audio block of 64

there must be other examples...

cheers

2015-03-14 2:02 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:

> attached patch
>
> 2015-03-14 2:02 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:
>
>> I was trying to get a bang at every sample and found out that the minimum
>> time bang~ works is at the 64 blocksize, check attached patch.
>>
>> Anyway, no question, just saying... but yeah, I don't see why it has to
>> be this way. Hopefully it can increase its resolution someday.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150314/17d3bcdb/attachment.html>