[PD] Problems with maintaining Pd-extended (was Mess and redundancy...)

[Flávio Schiavoni]

Dear all,

I'm also working in a project with a undergrad student that maybe can be 
a good solution to pure data externals maintenance.
He is creating a package manager to PD, like a deb packet with a 
repository definition and so on.
It's his final essay and he needs to work alone on it.
As soon as he has a first release we intend to share it here.
I hope it will help to manage externals distribution.

Cheers

Flávio Schiavoni



Em 06-06-2015 13:37, Dan Wilcox escreveu:
> To save extra discussion energy and *possibly* let the “cat out of
> the bag” let me say this: just wait a bit, something good is in the
> works to offer a solution to many of these problems.
> 
> I won't say anything more until the parties involved feel they are
> ready.
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika [1]
> danomatika.com [2]
> 
> robotcowboy.com [3]
> 
>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 11:39 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>> 
>> I know I'm missing much of the technical details, but my idea is
>> that if Pd Extended is up and running, it should be fairly easy for
>> people to update libraries (like Fred is doing with cyclone now) and
>> release an updated version with the updated objects... meaning we
>> didn't have to wait for two years for a bug fix. But somehow this
>> only makes sense in the "vanilla route".
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://twitter.com/danomatika
> [2] http://danomatika.com
> [3] http://robotcowboy.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list