[PD] [initbang] vs [loadbang]

Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki at gmail.com
Sun Jul 5 11:56:29 CEST 2015

I've made an abstraction with an arbitrary number of inlets, and in
extended you can save it in a patch as its connections will be maintained
(using [initbang] to create the inlets), but in vanilla it's not possible
cause I'm using [loadbang] and Pd fails to make the connections (as the
inlets are being created after the patch has been loaded).

Is there a way to achieve the [initbang] effect in vanilla? Or is there any
intention to include [initbang] in a future vanilla release?

Also, can't seem to find any initbang.c or initbang.pd_darwin. I guess it's
in a file that contains more classes and is called something else. Is there
a way to find a binary or code to compile, so I can use [initbang] in
vanilla on os x?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150705/cfd654ad/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list