[PD] [initbang] vs [loadbang]
jack at rybn.org
Sun Jul 5 22:07:52 CEST 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yes, nice, all is in the last line in the abstraction ;)
Le 05/07/2015 22:01, Roman Haefeli a écrit :
> On Son, 2015-07-05 at 21:04 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 07/05/2015 08:57 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>>>> saving the "dynin.pd" abstraction, will break it.
>>> abstraction. I put [r _initbang] but it won't work.
>> the trick is *not* to have a [r _initbang] in your patch. the
>> trick is to generate a message sent to the "_initbang" label.
>> this is a fragile hack, hence all my warnings; esp. the first
>> warning "do not save" is for real - and it's not because you will
>> save the dynamically generated objects, but because it will break
>> the init logic.
>> and i would very much prefer if anybody who wants to use that
>> trick discovers themselves how it actually works (e.g. by
>> studying the patch i gave).
> Despite your slight tone of discouragement to use such a hack,
> it's still a cool and smart hack. Thanks for sharing.
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and
> account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pd-list