[PD] [initbang] vs [loadbang]

[Jack]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, nice, all is in the last line in the abstraction ;)
++

Jack



Le 05/07/2015 22:01, Roman Haefeli a écrit :
> On Son, 2015-07-05 at 21:04 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 07/05/2015 08:57 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>>>> saving the "dynin.pd" abstraction, will break it.
>> [...]
>>> abstraction. I put [r _initbang] but it won't work.
>> 
>> the trick is *not* to have a [r _initbang] in your patch. the
>> trick is to generate a message sent to the "_initbang" label. 
>> this is a fragile hack, hence all my warnings; esp. the first
>> warning "do not save" is for real - and it's not because you will
>> save the dynamically generated objects, but because it will break
>> the init logic.
>> 
>> 
>> and i would very much prefer if anybody who wants to use that
>> trick discovers themselves how it actually works (e.g. by
>> studying the patch i gave).
> 
> Despite your slight tone of discouragement to use such a hack,
> it's still a cool and smart hack. Thanks for sharing.
> 
> Roman
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and
> account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVmY6YAAoJEOuluecjw8GUKjEH/1UFnrPIypRG6mgXM7H3Z6Xn
K1u7VfjOWM5minDFjz8bZN2diQ638buFfmV7q4oNwImcKgp83nN7EoqOmueFrExg
BjN4k2PMqE7SjloW/KLYT11n4ZR2Y8HYZXXwmh39jMMoiiaC1kyEGBoMfPSU9ZaI
iW+lbRz3l8cyvDAkctERMIqv+o5XN0AdhOunykMmGILZzF1Tvl4U3Fd8hqK1/IQr
lgMiuKXHez6givW+98Vu+QBvsilXrJTUffUsWvmatYqlxBhTfsJPhr8+PoHxp3mY
x+0x9Pk0ZYlzLD9vbRPeMaIC3f6L3FKRFisDsLYLShIi6hwP/PeiC55URm0/LoU=
=hSqe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----