[PD] [initbang] vs [loadbang]

Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki at gmail.com
Mon Jul 6 10:01:52 CEST 2015

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:04 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> On 07/05/2015 08:57 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> >> saving the "dynin.pd" abstraction, will break it.
> [...]
> > abstraction. I put [r _initbang] but it won't work.
> the trick is *not* to have a [r _initbang] in your patch.
> the trick is to generate a message sent to the "_initbang" label.
> this is a fragile hack, hence all my warnings; esp. the first warning
> "do not save" is for real - and it's not because you will save the
> dynamically generated objects, but because it will break the init logic.
> and i would very much prefer if anybody who wants to use that trick
> discovers themselves how it actually works (e.g. by studying the patch i
> gave)
Didn't realise I should study the patch in its text form... Jack made this
clear. Now it works, thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150706/7429fcdb/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list