[PD] questions about [send]/[receive]

[Cyrille Henry]

hello,

snd/receive react just like a simple connection.


t b b b
      print bang1
   send foo
print bang3




receive foo
print bang2

will print
bang1
bang2
bang3

whatever the receiver position.



if you got 1 send and 2 receive , execution order of the receives is undefined.

with 2 send / 1 receive : 1 send is 1st received.


cheers
c

Le 13/07/2015 22:39, rolfm at dds.nl a écrit :
>
> hi list,
>
> to not make a maze of a complicated patch
> i use quite often send/receive objects inside the patch.
>
> triggered by the recent thread about execution order and depth-first,
> i'm starting to doubt the above mentioned habit.
>
> in an much older thread it is said that:
>   apart from the "right to left" rule for outlets (and inlets?)
> and the "depth first" rule,
> execution order in Pd is not defined.
>
> does it mean that there's nothing to say/know about send/receive's?
>
> for example:
>
> when 2 different [send A]'s go to the same [receive A] will there be used a "first-in first-out" procedure?
>
> [send]/[receive]'s inside a subpatch are they handled before [send]/[receive]'s which 'cross the border' of the subpatch?
>
> any info about Pd's 'stack handling' is also appreciated.
>
> rolf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list