[PD] LibXtract for Pd?
katjavetter at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 12:56:54 CEST 2015
Thanks for your response. I cloned the repo to see the history, and
noticed a tendency of simplification: FFTW replaced by Ooura,
autotools build system replaced by makefiles. Nice! In fact the whole
library looks much simpler than one would expect for the given
functionality. Even the Pd and MaxMSP wrappers were amazingly small
and simple files.
For a library so systematic as LibXtract it makes sense to avoid
wrapper code duplication. But will the extra complexity and overhead
of Flext be justified in the case of these two wrapper externals plus
corresponding makefiles? If the build system is your main concern,
there may be a way to use a helper makefile like this for the Pd
external and adapt (arguments for) it to build the MaxMSP version:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:15 AM, James Bullock <James.Bullock at bcu.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Katja,
> I removed the Max / Pd wrappers during a recent "clean up" of the
> repository. The plan is to rewrite them using Flext. I'm afraid I can't give
> a precise timescale for this, but I might get it done over the summer.
> Dr Jamie Bullock | Reader in Music Technology | Director of Integra Lab |
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:31 pm, katja <katjavetter at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is libxtract (still) available for Pd? This paper has an illustration of it:
> Apparently it was announced on Pd list in 2006. But on the current
> LibXtract repository (https://github.com/jamiebullock/LibXtract) I
> can't find any reference to Pd.
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
More information about the Pd-list