[PD] questions about [send]/[receive]

Frank Barknecht fbar at footils.org
Sat Jul 18 11:28:17 CEST 2015

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:39:42PM +0200, rolfm at dds.nl wrote:
> does it mean that there's nothing to say/know about send/receive's?
> for example:
> when 2 different [send A]'s go to the same [receive A] will there be
> used a "first-in first-out" procedure?
> [send]/[receive]'s inside a subpatch are they handled before
> [send]/[receive]'s which 'cross the border' of the subpatch?

No, they aren't, see attachment. The "border" of a subpatch is invisible in
this regard. To have a defined execution order (that doesn't rely
on creation order) use direct connections at least where order matters.

 Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: execute-sub.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150718/a6b59609/attachment.bin>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list