[PD] [cos~]replacement for webPd patch

Julian Brooks jbeezez at gmail.com
Sun Aug 23 11:15:58 CEST 2015


...
[env~] being another

On 23 August 2015 at 10:14, Julian Brooks <jbeezez at gmail.com> wrote:

> [table] yes
> (object list here:
>  https://github.com/sebpiq/WebPd/blob/master/OBJECTLIST.md )
>
> not sure about cosinesum message (nice call hadn't thought of that) - will
> check later when back at it.
>
> I'm presuming that there's solid reasoning on Seb's part why certain
> objects haven't yet been ported yet (ie they're tricky).
>
>
> On 22 August 2015 at 19:31, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Does webpd have [table] and the cosinesum method for garrays?
>>
>> -Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 1:44 PM, Julian Brooks <jbeezez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Replacement with Vanilla please.
>>
>> Will work my up to porting...
>>
>> Cheers Jonathan
>>
>> On 22 August 2015 at 16:50, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Webpd doesn't include every vanilla class.  So I guess from Julian's
>> question that [cos~] isn't there.
>>
>> Julian-- are you looking to replace it with other vanilla objects, or are
>> you trying to figure out how to port it to webpd?
>>
>> -Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 11:44 AM, i go bananas <hard.off at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Cos~ is vanilla pd.  How does it not work?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150823/3af9db22/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list