[PD] [cos~]replacement for webPd patch

Joe White white.joe4 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 26 11:24:01 CEST 2015


>
> I'll have to use a slow ScriptProcessorNode.


Here's to hoping for Audio Worker Nodes aye :(

Out of curiosity how are the native nodes different from using the
ScriptProcessorNode? For something simple like abs~ or wrap~ is
performance *that
*drastically worse?



On 26 August 2015 at 09:53, Julian Brooks <jbeezez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Seb,
>
> Thanks for having a go.
> While absolutely agreeing with IOhannes, is it the same situation with
> [abs~] and [wrap~]?
>
> Regards,
>
> Julian]
>
>
>
> On 26 August 2015 at 09:36, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-08-26 10:25, s p wrote:
>> > Hmm ... actually I got carried away. I can't implement [cos~] or [env~]
>> > with native web audio API nodes.
>> > I'll have to use a slow ScriptProcessorNode. So if performance is not a
>> > concern for you I'll do it, but I won't integrate it to the core of
>> WebPd.
>> >
>>
>> since it's really easy to build [cos~] with writing [cos] values to a
>> table¹, wouldn't it make sense to add [cos] and [until] to the WebPd core?
>>
>>
>> fgmsdt
>> IOhannes
>>
>> ¹ assuming that table lookups in WebPd are as blindingly fast as
>> anyhwere else.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150826/b0f2c1d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list