[PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 22:35:36 CEST 2015


hey, how is going with this object?

I just wanted to say it'd be really good if it was updated to max size of
4096, which is the current configuration since max 6

256 is just too little and made more sense back in the day of max 5

hopefully it's an easy update, what do you say?

cheers

2015-08-01 15:18 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl>:

> Hi Julian,
>
> Thank you for your report. I am not the expert, just one of the current
> maintainers if the cyclone set of objects. I think the object works, but
> maybe not as the Max object. If this is the case I will try to fix it.
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am sorry to bother you but I have an important question about the
> > buffir~ object.
> > I hope you can help me with this. I am not too experiencd with PD but I
> > try to make
> > an Binaural-Renderer. I want to use the buffir~ object to convolve an IR
> > to a signal.
> > This works right now. But I want to change the IR used for convolving
> > with the signal
> > when the head orientation changes. I had a look at the MAX/MSP 5
> > documentation
> > as I understand this object was taken from MAX where the buffir~ object
> > can be told
> > to change the buffer~ object by using the set message. I tried this in
> > PD but nothing
> > happens. Obviously the IR is not loaded as there is no signal passing
> > through the
> > buffir~ object when using $1 as the name of the table and send a message
> > [set tablename]
> > to input 1 (the signal input where the clear message can be applied). Is
> > this function
> > not implemented in the PD buffir~ object? Or is there something I do
> wrong?
>
> Note '$1' is not literary part of the name, just a placeholder of the
> first element on the message (=list) you send to the object. If
> something is wrong here, the console should contain an error message.
> Also see the help on $-variables.
> >
> > I would be verry happy if could help me with this question! If this is
> > not implemented
> > and can't be worked around do you have any ideas how to solve my problem?
> > Thank you very much in advance!
>
> The attached patch is an adaptation of the help-patch, including a
> second buffer to switch to. Yo need to open it and draw non-zero values
> to get a signal through. It looks like you also have to provide the
> offset and length arguments, as leaving them out results in zero -
> meaning no useful convolution takes place.
>
> When I have time, I'll check the behaviour of the Max5 object. It might
> work better or more user friendly. But first on the planning are some
> weeks vacation :-).
> >
> > Regards Julian Jochheim
> >
>
> Greetings,
>
> Fred Jan
>
> P.S. I added the pd-list in the reply, the main forum for issues like
> this one (http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150828/e844b33c/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list