jancsika at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 5 17:57:50 CEST 2015
On Monday, October 5, 2015 11:40 AM, Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at> wrote:
You're right that it's easy to implement as an abstraction but I was rather thinking about execution speed. I guess a fictional object like [array drip] that would just iterate through the array using a C loop would be the fastest possible method. I don't see how you could even get close to that with abstractions, especially when using only vanilla objects.
> Gesendet: Montag, 05. Oktober 2015 um 14:00 Uhr
> Von: "IOhannes m zmoelnig" <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> An: pd-list at lists.iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] array-abs
> On 2015-10-05 13:25, Christof Ressi wrote:
> > I'm only dreaming, but maybe that could be a fantastic feature for a future pd
> > vanilla release. :-)
> i think it's so easy to implement as an abstraction that *i* think it
> should go into supporting libraries (like array-abs).
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list