[PD] prevent console error messages

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Oct 14 12:12:53 CEST 2015


On 2015-10-14 12:07, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2015-10-14 09:34, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> I don't see why [textfile] shouldn't report that to the patch instead of
>> the console. 
> 
> because it would require a lot of code to be added to all use-cases of
> [┼žextfile] in order to not break the feedback where it is indeed desired
> and needed.

this should have read:
"because it would require code to be added to all uses of [┼žextfile]
where the error is indeed desired and needed."

> 
> this *could* be done in a way satisfying to both, if Pd had some kind of
> exception handling.
> however, it doesn't.
> 
> 
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151014/63ea280a/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list