[PD] prevent console error messages

[Matt Barber]

​A simpler thing would be to just have any object that deals with file i/o
to return something like an "exit status" on a read or after a write
attempt.

As long as we're wishing for stuff, I wish vanilla included the [error]
object for proper error handling in abstractions. And a bitwise XOR.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
wrote:

> On 2015-10-14 12:07, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > On 2015-10-14 09:34, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >> I don't see why [textfile] shouldn't report that to the patch instead of
> >> the console.
> >
> > because it would require a lot of code to be added to all use-cases of
> > [ŧextfile] in order to not break the feedback where it is indeed desired
> > and needed.
>
> this should have read:
> "because it would require code to be added to all uses of [ŧextfile]
> where the error is indeed desired and needed."
>
> >
> > this *could* be done in a way satisfying to both, if Pd had some kind of
> > exception handling.
> > however, it doesn't.
> >
> >
> > fgamsdr
> > IOhannes
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151014/c6fae1c0/attachment.html>