[PD] [packOSC] reentrancy problem

Roman Haefeli reduzent at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 17:57:45 CET 2015

Oops.. the test patch is bogus. If [packOSC] wouldn't throw away the
second message, the patch would trigger a stack overflow. Attached is a
patch that wouldn't trigger any problems if [packOSC] would support


On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 13:54 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Hi all
> I noticed that [packOSC] does not support reentrancy (check attached
> patch). 
> Many object classes _do_ support reentrancy. At the same time it seems
> common in other environments not to support reentrancy. I wonder if this
> is considered bug. If so, I'll file a bug report.
> Roman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: packOSC-reentrancy-problem.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151105/17b4fec9/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151105/17b4fec9/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list