[PD] band limited (anti-alias) techniques

[Matt Barber]

As it so often does, I think it comes down to what you hope to be able to
do with them. I wouldn't expect to be able to run 100 instances of my
[gbuzz~] abstraction (save me, gbuzz!), and it certainly would be more
efficient as part of an external. But handling efficiency/performance
tradeoffs is just part of Pd patching, especially with respect to
synthesis. What's your use case?

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I didn't think about other solutions in a patch besides *oversampling +
> filtering* and I considered it too expensive and not perfect. I assumed
> most of the techniques for bandlimiting wouldn't be possible as patches
> and/or would be inefficient.
>
> But you (all) tell me :)
>
> 2015-11-24 14:20 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
>
>> On 2015-11-24 16:25, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>> > but I think the best way to go would be to code an
>> > external,
>>
>> why?
>>
>> fgamsdr
>> IOhannes
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151124/9e2c2538/attachment.html>