[PD] [hdplay~] problem

[Dan Wilcox]

Ah, if so it’d be nice to have that noted in the help patch ;)

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Nov 21, 2015, at 4:00 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>>
> Date: November 20, 2015 at 10:15:53 AM MST
> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] [hdplay~] problem
> 
> 
> On 11/20/2015 07:07 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>> Judging from the [readsf~] help patch, [readsf~] takes two optional arguments:
>> 
>> 1. number of channels
>> 2. buffer size per channel in bytes
>> 
>> I think argument 2 might be worth investigating ...
> 
> it is, but you might discover that it is about something else:
> [readsf~] reads the data from harddisk in a separate thread. the "buffer
> size" defines how much the reading thread can read ahead of the playback.
> 
> gfmrdsa
> IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151125/7a57b782/attachment.html>