[PD] Cyclone issues update
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Dec 7 22:01:50 CET 2015
On 12/07/2015 09:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Anyway, those are my thoughts on it, anybody else?
i was going to write something similar, thanks alex for doing it instead.
for me (as a non-user of cyclone), the main purpose of this library is
to provide a max->pd compat layer.
if this is still the case¹, then the compatibility with the max-objects
should be the primary target and not the consistency of the library per se².
gmrds
IOhannes
¹ and it might well not be - it's the authors decision; but it ought to
be clearly communicated
² if someone relies on the old ("wrong") behaviour, they can always use
an older version of cyclone.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151207/d60fee77/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list