[PD] [change] inside [gemmouse] necessary?

[João Pais]

Hello list,

I was trying out something with [gemmouse], and noticed that it has an
integrated [change] in it: repeated values are filtered from its outlet.
Since usually the output of any sensor is the values at a steady rate, does
it make more sense to use the "normal" behaviour instead of already having
something extra inside? My point is that it's much easier to add a [change]
after [gemmouse], than to do the opposite.

Best,

Joao
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160118/0cd04ce3/attachment.html>