[PD] fftease 3.0 compatibility with Linux. Was Re: fftease compatibility with Pd-0.46-7

[Ivica Bukvic]

This is likely due to binary incompatibility. Please try with pd-l2ork.

-- 
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Associate Professor
Computer Music
ICAT Senior Fellow
Director -- DISIS, L2Ork
Virginia Tech
School of Performing Arts – 0141
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-6139
ico at vt.edu
www.performingarts.vt.edu
disis.icat.vt.edu
l2ork.icat.vt.edu
ico.bukvic.net
On Jan 29, 2016 2:56 PM, "Samuel Burt" <composer.samuel.burt at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ivica,
>
> I'm trying it out now. I had previously tried installing pd-fftease 2.5.2
> through deken. I grabbed the lyon/ folder out of Pd-l2ork and dropped it
> into ~/pd-externals. Pd was using the deken version (2.5.2), instead. So, I
> removed fftease from /usr/local/lib/pd-externals and copied the lyon/
> folder there. I then created [pvoc~], but when I turn on audio with a
> [pvoc~] object, Pd crashes with a segmentation fault. [granola~] (the
> granular pitch-shifter) works so I am assuming some of the other fftease
> objects work, but [pvoc~] gave me a hard crash every time.
>
> I'll keep hacking away at it. If anyone else discovers a solution, let me
> know. I could also reformat the patch to use the 2.5.2 [pvoc~] although
> then I can't program the patch on my Mac and then transfer it straight. I'd
> have to heavily modify it every time.
>
> Thanks for the recommendation to use pd-l2ork's libraries.
>
> Sam
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>> Pd-l2ork is not binary compatible with vanilla, although non-gui objects
>> compiled for pd-l2ork will likely work ok.
>>
>> --
>> Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
>> Associate Professor
>> Computer Music
>> ICAT Senior Fellow
>> Director -- DISIS, L2Ork
>> Virginia Tech
>> School of Performing Arts – 0141
>> Blacksburg, VA 24061
>> (540) 231-6139
>> ico at vt.edu
>> www.performingarts.vt.edu
>> disis.icat.vt.edu
>> l2ork.icat.vt.edu
>> ico.bukvic.net
>> On Jan 27, 2016 5:42 PM, "Samuel Burt" <composer.samuel.burt at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Ivica.
>>>
>>> I assume I can just yank all the precompiled plug-ins out of the
>>> extra/lyon/ folder. There shouldn't be any problem with that as long as I
>>> point my path to the right place?
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:29 PM Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pd-l2ork for RPi comes prepackaged with it.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
>>>> Associate Professor
>>>> Computer Music
>>>> ICAT Senior Fellow
>>>> Director -- DISIS, L2Ork
>>>> Virginia Tech
>>>> School of Performing Arts – 0141
>>>> Blacksburg, VA 24061
>>>> (540) 231-6139
>>>> ico at vt.edu
>>>> www.performingarts.vt.edu
>>>> disis.icat.vt.edu
>>>> l2ork.icat.vt.edu
>>>> ico.bukvic.net
>>>> On Jan 27, 2016 5:20 PM, "Samuel Burt" <composer.samuel.burt at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Eric,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been so excited by the results I got after fine tuning my patch
>>>>> with [pvoc~]. [pvoc~] runs so efficiently. I never quite got [mindwarp~]
>>>>> functioning without major audio problems that I didn't have with a previous
>>>>> version, though. It wasn't a big deal, because the audio routine I've
>>>>> created sounds find without it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, that I've got fftease 3.0 running smoothly, I discovered I can't
>>>>> run it on my Raspberry Pi. Would it be possible for me to compile it on
>>>>> Linux? or is 3.0 tuned just for the Mac, these days? Do I need to redo my
>>>>> code to use fftease 2.5?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM Samuel Burt <
>>>>> composer.samuel.burt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's working well, now. I think there were also some compatibility
>>>>>> issues with the way the objects used to work and the way they work now. I
>>>>>> was also getting crashes, but limited the warp factor input to mindwarp~ to
>>>>>> be 1/16 to 16. I must have been sending really bad numbers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't make clean at the end and I should check my path to make
>>>>>> sure both folders are included. Other libraries I've noticed use only one
>>>>>> folder. Any particular reason to keep them separate?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160129/2798d743/attachment-0001.html>