[PD] readanysf~ for windows ? (another try ...)

[patrice colet]

Le 16/02/2016 22:48, oliver a écrit :
> patrice colet wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, the dll you have should work when you provide all
>>>> missing libraries in bin folder.
>>>
>>> unfortunately it doesn't.
>>>
>
>>>
>>
>> If libs you have to put in bin dir aren't compatible with the ones
>> provided by pd-extended, it might not work.
>>
>
>
> small update on the [readanysf~] on windows discussion:
>
> version 0.42 (plus included libraries) works on a windows XP system 
> with pd-extended 0.43.4 !
>
> tried it on windows 7 with the exact same package to no success. i 
> even tried "compatibility mode" set to "WindowsXP" for all .exe files 
> in pd-extended (just for a little trial and error) - didn't change 
> anything.
>
> any ideas why this object works on XP but not WIN7 ?
>

  I didn't try it on seven, it has been compiled on vista, maybe running 
pd through gdb could say which part of the code prevents from loading, 
the problem should come from a lib provided by seven that is not as the 
same as the one provided by vista.

//
> as i already pointed out, all other libraries of pd-extended are being 
> loaded and working correctly, save for [readanysf~]
>
  The good new is that if someone is able to get readanysf~ to work, it 
will be possible to use libgmerlin in Gem on windows because it uses 
almost the same libraries.


>
> best
>
> oliver
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160217/5575b822/attachment.html>