[PD] How's Pd limited?

Christof Ressi christof.ressi at gmx.at
Thu Feb 25 16:47:33 CET 2016

> you could easy have hard synced oscillators, but no...

yes, you can, with a little trick. See my abstraction (needs zexy).

Have fun.

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 03:22 Uhr
Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <porres at gmail.com>
An: "Brian Fay" <ovaltinevortex at gmail.com>
Cc: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
Betreff: Re: [PD] How's Pd limited?

2016-02-24 18:54 GMT-03:00 Brian Fay <ovaltinevortex at gmail.com>:
The issue with blocking is that you don't have fine-grained control of an audio, process, right?
there are plenty techniques for having patches running with sample accuracy - problem is that most pd and max objects miss this point, supercollider seems to be more at it. For example, you can reset the phase of osc~ or phasor~ via control messages only, if you could trigger it via an impulse oscillator, you could easy have hard synced oscillators, but no... if you want that, you need to make a more complicated patch, but there are ways around it._______________________________________________ Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list[http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list]
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: chardsync~.pd
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160225/fd8ca709/attachment.ksh>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list