[PD] s~ & r~ with block size other than 64?
claude at mathr.co.uk
Fri Feb 26 04:38:24 CET 2016
On 26/02/16 03:21, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> howdy, is there any particularly good reason why [s~]/[r~] must run at only
> 64 block sizes?
> if the issue is that they may have conflicting/different sizes between
> them, why not give the same error as you get now for blocks other than 64?
> "receive~ x: vector size mismatch
> sigsend x: unexpected vector size"
> It'd be really convenient for feedback loops
if you want something that works right now, tabsend~ and tabreceive~
don't have any restriction about table size must be equal to block size
must be equal to 64
see attached example of a single self-modulating fm oscillator with
single sample feedback (block~ 1)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 943 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pd-list