[PD] s~ & r~ with block size other than 64?

Claude Heiland-Allen claude at mathr.co.uk
Fri Feb 26 04:38:24 CET 2016

On 26/02/16 03:21, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> howdy, is there any particularly good reason why [s~]/[r~] must run at only
> 64 block sizes?
> if the issue is that they may have conflicting/different sizes between
> them, why not give the same error as you get now for blocks other than 64?
> "receive~ x: vector size mismatch
> sigsend x: unexpected vector size"
> It'd be really convenient for feedback loops

if you want something that works right now, tabsend~ and tabreceive~ 
don't have any restriction about table size must be equal to block size 
must be equal to 64

see attached example of a single self-modulating fm oscillator with 
single sample feedback (block~ 1)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: single-sample-feedback.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160226/ca9e0532/attachment.bin>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list