[PD] s~ & r~ with block size other than 64?
Alexandre Torres Porres
porres at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 07:08:58 CET 2016
really? can't see how much more relevantly efficient it'd be, and it kinda
does check it already, hence the errors
2016-02-26 3:07 GMT-03:00 i go bananas <hard.off at gmail.com>:
> I would assume it's also slightly more efficient that pd doesn't have to
> check the vector size when processing the s~ / r~ functions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list