[PD] s~ & r~ with block size other than 64?

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 07:08:58 CET 2016

really? can't see how much more relevantly efficient it'd be, and it kinda
does check it already, hence the errors


2016-02-26 3:07 GMT-03:00 i go bananas <hard.off at gmail.com>:

> I would assume it's also slightly more efficient that pd doesn't have to
> check the vector size when processing the s~ / r~ functions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160226/bb8a715a/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list