[PD] what's the deal with [utime] object?
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Sat Feb 27 16:39:43 CET 2016
On 02/27/2016 09:40 AM, s p wrote:
> Yes, I guessed the issue was with precision, but in that case why would
> anyone want to use it?
[utime]? i have no idea.
what's worse: i have no clue why anyone would *write* that object with
the given limitations of a single precision Pd.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Pd-list