[PD] what's the deal with [utime] object?

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Sat Feb 27 16:39:43 CET 2016

On 02/27/2016 09:40 AM, s p wrote:
> Yes, I guessed the issue was with precision, but in that case why would
> anyone want to use it?

[utime]? i have no idea.
what's worse: i have no clue why anyone would *write* that object with
the given limitations of a single precision Pd.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160227/5ef4dad1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list