[PD] what's the deal with [utime] object?
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Sat Feb 27 17:31:35 CET 2016
On 02/27/2016 04:49 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
>> we should have switched to doubles long ago.
> According to katja, that would trigger a zombie apocalypse in external land.
first of all, we should have switched to doubles *long* ago.
> And the only way to tell the zombies from the survivors would be to... *gulp*...
> actually read external library code.
> Personally, I'd rather get eaten by a zombie than do that.
hmm, what again was wrong with my proposal to distinguish between single
and double precision externals, allowing to have externals that would
work on both precisions ("phat")?
it would probably lead to mass extinction of externals that have no
source code available (which - unlike zombie apocalypse - is probably a
good thing anyhow).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Pd-list