[PD] what's the deal with [utime] object?

Jack jack at rybn.org
Sun Feb 28 00:24:42 CET 2016

Le 27/02/2016 17:31, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit :
> On 02/27/2016 04:49 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
>>> we should have switched to doubles long ago.
>> According to katja, that would trigger a zombie apocalypse in external land.  
> first of all, we should have switched to doubles *long* ago.
>> And the only way to tell the zombies from the survivors would be to... *gulp*...
>> actually read external library code.
>> Personally, I'd rather get eaten by a zombie than do that.
> hmm, what again was wrong with my proposal to distinguish between single
> and double precision externals, allowing to have externals that would
> work on both precisions ("phat")?
> it would probably lead to mass extinction of externals that have no
> source code available (which - unlike zombie apocalypse - is probably a
> good thing anyhow).

Are you sure [1][2][3] ?


[1] Night of the Living Dead
[2] Dawn of the dead
[3] Day of the Dead

> gmdsar
> IOhannes
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160228/9d358d5d/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list