[PD] strange result with netsend/netreceive

Jack jack at rybn.org
Fri Mar 25 23:52:44 CET 2016


What surprised me, it's that you can get a 'good' representation of
[1000001( when you send it to [rawprint] (from zexy), but the same
message sent through netsend/netreceive become [1000000(.
I must therefore conclude that [rawprint] can get exactly 1000001 (and
maybe netsend can too), but the couple /netsend/netreceive or netreceive
can't give the right value ?
I hope i am enough clear.
Example attached.
++

Jack



Le 25/03/2016 23:17, cyrille henry a écrit :
> pd represent 1000001 with 1e+06.
> it's the same representation  than 1000000
> 
> ...
> 
> c
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Le 25/03/2016 23:00, Jack a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> when i send a float '1000001' with 'netsend', 'netreceine' get '1000000'.
>> Is it a normal behavior ?
>>
>> Configuration :
>> Pd 0.46.5
>> Ubuntu 15.10
>>
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> PS : i find a workaround by sending the number as symbol.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: example.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 519 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160325/ac247e9c/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list