[PD] [ot] Re: garbled list digests?

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 18:31:05 CEST 2016


I did? Looks fine here: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-03/thread.html <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-03/thread.html>

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:28 AM, Max <abonnements at revolwear.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2016년 03월 30일 00:49, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2016, at 3:46 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at
>>> <mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>>> 
>>> (e.g. if the reason is to not be drowned in the flood of Pd-list mails,
>>> a better solution is to filter them into a separate mail folder)
>> 
>> I already do, just want a low volume in general.
> 
> and congratulations, you just started a new thread to the same topic.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160329/ffe0beb8/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list